Lily Lake Protection & Rehabilitation District

Rev. 18-Aug-07 Back to Home

2007 meeting summary

The annual meeting of the Lilly Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District was held on August 18, 2007 in the Wheatland Town Hall. Jeff Butler, Bob Herda, Andy Lois, Don Puchalski, Ron Vollmer, Sheila Siegler, and many lake residents attended. The main topics discussed were as follows:

Water Tests

The latest water test came in at 26 / 100. That makes two good tests in a row. The beach can be safely re-opened. Wheatland tests only the water at the beach. It does not test further out in the lake or in front of private property. Jennifer Reed reported a level of 43 / 100 at her property while the beach tested at 1733 / 100. You can take a water sample to Burlington for a $20 test.

The Town has been testing the beach water since 1996. Last year was the first time that a problem was detected.

Goose Invasion

During a spring roundup, USDA officials tried to grab the 2 adults and 3 juvenile geese they could find on the lake. The adults flew off, even though it was supposedly molting season when geese can't fly. We did not get charged for the failed capture attempt.

The invasion seems to correspond to the wheat harvest. Andy Lois reported seeing a lot of geese feeding in his fields after the wheat was harvested. They apparently look for water to spend the night. They are now gone. Jack Bobula had to clean up the beach every day during the invasion.

How To Repel the Geese

Purchase artificial (or real) swans or owls?
Any artificial predators may work for a few days, but then the geese get used to them. Swans are aggressive to geese only when mating and protecting their young. Swans and geese swam together on the lake earlier this summer. The DNR is trying to get rid of non-native mute swans. You have to jump through expensive hoops (like getting the swans neutered) if you want to keep them on the lake.

Shoot the geese?
Goose season runs September 1 - 15. Ron's grandson is a certified hunter who is willing to dispatch the geese with a bow and arrow if you give him permission to go on your property. He will use his own equipment and give you the gooseburger.

The Town has an ordinance against shooting close to dwellings. Gun harvesting of geese is definitely out of the question because of the distances bullets can travel. There may be a way to get a waiver for bow-and-arrow hunting.

Put a low-voltage electric strip on the swimming pier to give them a mild zap?
That's really problematical because people use the pier too. The geese are not just on the pier. They're all over the beach.

Ordinance Against Feeding Geese?

The Town attorney can draw up an ordinance, but then how are you going to catch the feeder? Even if you post signs saying there's an ordinance against something, people don't read the signs.

We may know who the feeder is. We're just waiting for an ordinance to be able to nail him. And so what if people don't read the signs? That's their problem. You can still ticket them for the offense.

Weed Control

The weed spraying is less and less effective. The spraying service said that the lake level was low this spring, which encourages weed growth. Homeowners disagreed with the perception of low levels. The service came out even though water temperature was not optimal because homeowners wanted them to get started on weed eradication.

Weed harvester: $35,000
We need to purchase a weed harvester. You can get one with a 4-ft cut that cuts 4 to 5 feet down for $35,000; that includes the trailer. You could store the machine at the Transfer Station. You'd also need to get a dump truck to haul the weeds away and find a farmer who will accept the weeds. Any pesticide on the weeds may make the weeds unacceptable to farmers. You'd probably have to cut 3 times per summer (once per month). Some grant money might be available to help with the cost. You could also require a $15 to $20 per season sticker for all watercraft to offset costs.

Weed harvesting: cost is more like $100,000
The $35,000 is just one of the many costs. You have to factor in the dump truck (Wheatland does not own a truck), insurance, and the salary of someone who will go around the lake at 3 miles/hour cutting weeds. Weeds are like grass: you cut them and they come back. Years ago, someone here at Lilly Lake cut the weeds, and they just came back. At Pell Lake, they're out every week cutting weeds. At Loon Lake near Antioch, they're spending roughly $50,000/year to harvest weeds. The machinery suffers numerous breakdowns.

Permit to cut weeds
The DNR requires a permit to cut weeds. Tom Gerner has asked the DNR to come out this week to look at the weeds that are topping out to see if we will be allowed to cut them. The DNR may be sympathetic to getting rid of the milfoil, as long as you don't harm native weeds. We may be able to increase the spraying where the milfoil tops out.

Hire someone to cut the weeds?
Two years ago, we contacted Paddock Lake. They were not interested in providing weed-cutting service. We need to review the situation again to see if someone would do it for hire.

Dredge the shore areas
When the dredging project was done in the 1970's, they dredged the middle of the lake first. That dropped the water level near shore, and the barge could not get in to dredge the shore areas, especially the area roughly from the Puncochar property to the beach. Dredging is the real solution. When you chemically treat the weeds, they die and break down forming muck at the bottom of the lake. The DNR might allow some cleanup of the north side of the lake.
That won't help. Roughly 70% of the shoreline is badly weedy.

At the time of the dredging, there was an idea to use a small (8-inch) dredger to circle around the lake and pump continuously. You could dump the sludge on the Riley property.

Riley offered his property back in the 70's, but the DNR wouldn't allow the sludge to be put there.

Funding a dredging cleanup
Back in the 70's there was federal and state money to be had, but that's probably not the case now. Doing a dredging now will not be easy or cheap.

Paperwork on dredging project?
Who has the paperwork on the original dredging project? The DNR should have it, but the project was 30 years ago. They may have trouble finding it. Jennifer Reed will contact the DNR to see if she can get a copy of that paperwork.

Committee to investigate solutions
Lilly Lake homeowners have to form a committee to investigate solutions and present them to the District and Town Boards.

Tax Rate

The District tax rate will be about 4 cents per $1000 depending on how the current reassessment comes out.

Lake dredging history

What was the problem?

By 1970, the process of vegetation decay had filled the lake with muck to the point where the maximum water depth was 6 ft. Weeds were rampant. Underlying organic sediment was 30 to 35 ft deep. Some spots were so shallow that you could not run a motor boat. Activities like fishing and water skiing were very limited, and the experience was low quality. Winter fish kills caused dead, smelly fish to wash up on the shore in spring. No one was putting any money into the area. There was a real risk that property values would decline significantly due to the worsening condition of the lake.
Back to Lake dredging

What was the proposed solution?

Studies resulted in a proposal to dredge about 890,000 cubic yards (550 acre-feet, that is, 550 acres to a depth of 1 ft) of sediment out of the lake to increase the depth to about 22 ft. Some of the muck was spread on nearby farm land, but most of it was piped to a modified gravel pit about 2 miles away (off Hwy W, south of F and FR, near the Schwarz Nursery).
Back to Lake dredging

Who was involved in the project?

Don Puchalski led the effort, starting in 1971. He worked with the Town Board, engineering firms, the state, and the federal government. Although the project started out as a local one, new programs initiated at the state and federal levels offered some help with the financing. Changing environmental laws and financing programs delayed project start several times. At one point, the 5-year permit ran out. The government did extensive testing to ensure that the sludge would not harm the environment.

Engineer Associates of Elkhorn tested feasibility, prepared initial plans, and got a permit from the Wisconsin DNR. In 1974, Jensen and Johnson of Elkhorn took over planning and preparation of environmental impact statements. Johnson and Averill of Waukesha completed the design and development of the whole project. Robers Dredge of LaCrosse did the dredging. Mann Brothers of Elkhorn constructed the disposal site.
Back to Lake dredging

When and how was it done?

Dredging occurred over 2 years: July, 1978 through September, 1979. The first year, work started at 6 am and finished at 10 pm every day. The second year, it was decided to run 24 hours/day for 4 days of every week to avoid the jarring noise of diesel engine startup at 6 am and to allow use of the lake on weekends..

A 12-inch cutterhead sucked out muck and weeds. Two miles of welded, 12-inch polyethylene pipe carried sludge to the gravel pits. A booster station around the Riley and Topczewski property helped pump muck up hill. Property owners were paid $0.15/ft per year for a pipeline easement. Some of the muck was also applied to 160 acres of farmers' fields. Farmers got $40/acre/year for the loss of use of their land. After project completion, they got the benefit of decayed organic matter on their fields. People report seeing fish coming out of the pipe at the gravel pit. The entire shoreline was cleaned and graded at completion of the project.

During the dredging, use of the lake was minimal. The shoreline stretched out 200 ft in places. You could do a little boating and swimming in the middle of the lake. One pocket (about 100 ft by 300 ft) on the north shore had to be left because the water level was too low to work it. It was only in 1980 that the lake filled back out to its present size.
Back to Lake dredging

What did it cost?

Federal: $350,000
Local: $225,000
State: $155,000
Total: $730,000
Back to Lake dredging

What are the benefits?

New muck is accumulating at the rate of about 1/4 inch per year. At that rate, it will be about 200 years before Lilly Lake has to consider another dredging project.

Dredging pictures

Many thanks to Kathie Cashman for these pictures of the dredging operation. Note: The full-size versions of the photos run 150KB to 260KB.

Dredging rig
Dredging rig
View 1
Lake view 1
View 2
Lake view 2
Winter
Dredging site in winter
or Back to Lake dredging
Copyright © 1999 Lily Lake Summerhaven Association
Lilly Lake (Wisconsin)